Legal Opinion

Smith v. Southern Pacific Railroad

California Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1934No. S. F. 14863PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment quieting the title of the Southern Pacific Railroad Company to a strip of land less than an acre in area along its right of way in Santa Clara County.

The plaintiffs claim as joint tenants through a deed from one C. N. Anderson executed in 1923, and show a paper title by mesne conveyance from one C. H. Phillips, who was stipulated to be the record owner of the San Martin rancho, of which the strip of land was a part, at the time of its first conveyance as a separate parcel.

The respondent railroad company set up as a defense that the action was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Daniels v. Gualala Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hammond v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Almaden Vineyards Corp. v. ArnerichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Kendrick v. KleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Nat'L Gold Mining Corp. Vs. Hygrade Gold Co. Ltd. C/W 78984Nevada Supreme Court · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API