Legal Opinion
City of Redlands v. Nickerson
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 10, 1961No. Civ. 6336PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in a quiet title action. Two purported judgments were entered; one on June 1,1959; and the other, bearing the title “Amended Judgment,” on July 13, 1959. The appeal is from the latter. The respondent, city of Redlands, contends that the controlling judgment is that entered on June 1, 1959; that the notice of appeal herein was filed 101 days after entry of that judgment, which, therefore, has become final; that there may be only one judgment in an action; that the amended judgment is a nullity; and the appeal from the amended judgment should be dismissed.
The…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Wilbur v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Roeder Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Bank of California v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Baker v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Santa Clara Properties Co. v. R. L. C., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Safwenberg v. MarquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.