Legal Opinion
Helms Bakeries v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 15, 1942No. Civ. 11992PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McWILLIAMS, J. pro tem.
The defendants, constitut ing the State Board of Equalization, have appealed from a judgment under the terms of which they were permanently enjoined by the trial court from revoking or suspending plaintiff’s “Seller’s Permit.” The permit referred to had been issued to plaintiff under the provisions of the California Re tail Sales Tax Act of 1933 (Stats. 1933, p. 2599; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, Act 8493). Under the provisions of that act there was imposed a tax at the rate of 2% per cent of the gross receipts of all “retailers” from the sale of tangible personal…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Dows v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Bailey, Collector of Internal Revenue v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Shelton v. PlattSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Arkansas Building and Loan Assn. v. MaddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Modern Barber Colleges, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Pacific Motor Transport Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Palo Alto-Menlo Park Yellow Cab Co. v. Santa Clara County Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- CHIATELLO v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People Ex Rel. Franchise Tax Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.