Legal Opinion
In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 4, 2015No. 2014-1301PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Cuozzo Speed Technologies (“Cuozzo”) owns U.S. Patent No. 6,778,074 (the “'074 patent”). Garmin International, Inc. and Garmin USA, Inc. (collectively, “Garmin”) petitioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) for inter partes review (“IPR”) of claims 10, 14, and 17 of the '074 patent. The PTO granted Gar-min’s petition and instituted IPR. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) timely issued a final decision finding claims 10, 14, and 17 obvious. The…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Microsoft Corporation v. Proxyconn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Gtnx, Inc. v. Inttra, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Belden Inc. v. Berk-Tek LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.