Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge PLAGER.
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge HUGHES.
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
IntROduction
This is a covered business method (“CBM”) patent case, under § 18 of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”), Pub.L. No. 112-29, 125 Stat. 284 *1310(2011). It comes to us as an appeal of a final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”),1 the recently-created adjudicatory arm of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO” or “Government”).2 The case originated as a petition to the USPTO, submitted…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family PhysiciansSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. Directv, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Two-Way Media Ltd. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Recognicorp, LLC v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.