Legal Opinion

Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Lee

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 26, 2015No. 2014-1159PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACH, Circuit Judge.

Gilead Sciences, Inc. (“Gilead”) appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granting summary judgment to the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) on whether it properly calculated the Patent Term Adjustment (“PTA”) period for U.S. Patent No. 8,148,374 (“the '374 patent”). See Gilead SCis., Inc. v. Rea, 976 F.Supp.2d 833 (2013) (“Gilead I”). Because the district court properly granted the director’s motion for summary judgment, this court affirms.

Background

I

In 1994, Congress changed the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hyatt v. United States Patent & Trademark OfficeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  2. Balestra v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  3. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. IancuCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  4. Chudik v. HirshfeldCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
  5. Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc v. IancuCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API