Legal Opinion

Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 14, 1976No. 74-1023PublishedCited by 1,957 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

Petitioners, defendants in a class action, sought issuance of writs of mandamus from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to compel the District Court to vacate two discovery orders. The Court of Appeals refused to issue the writs. We hold that in the circumstances of this case — and particularly in light of the availability of an alternative, less extreme, path to modification of the challenged discovery orders — issuance of the writ is inappropriate. We therefore affirm.

I

Seven prisoners in the custody of the Department of Corrections of the State of California filed a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,957 opinions

  1. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Webster v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

1,952 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API