Legal Opinion
Gtnx, Inc. v. Inttra, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 16, 2015No. 2015-1349, 2015-1350, 2015-1352, 2015-1353PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION
TARANTO, Circuit Judge.
At the request of GTNX, Inc., the Patent Trial and Appeal Board instituted “covered business method patent” review proceedings for four patents owned by INTTRA, Inc. A few months later, the Board reconsidered its institution decisions, determined that institution of proceedings in these matters violated a statutory proscription, vacated the institution decisions, and terminated the proceedings. GTNX, Inc. v. INTTRA, Inc., CBM2014-00073 et al., 2014 WL 7723800 (PTAB Dec. 10, 2014). GTNX appeals, and INTTRA moves to dismiss the appeal. We grant the motion. In…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Trudeau v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. Volcano Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Westlake ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Achates Reference Publishing, Inc. v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Mylan Laboratories Ltd. v. Janssen Pharmaceutica, N.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Erwin Hymer Grp. N. Am., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.