Legal Opinion
Microsoft Corporation v. Proxyconn, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 16, 2015No. 2014-1542, 2014-1543PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Chief Judge.
This appeal arises from the inter partes review (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,-717 (“'717 patent”) owned by Proxyconn, Inc. (“Proxyconn”). The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) concluded that all of the challenged claims except claim 24 were unpatentable as anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102 alone or additionally as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. See Microsoft Corp. v. Proxyconn, Inc., IPR2012-00026 and IPR2013-00109, Paper No. 73 (PTAB Feb. 19, 2014) {“Board Decision”). Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) appeals the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Apple, Inc. v. Ameranth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Wasica Finance GmbH v. Continental Automotive Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Aqua Products, Inc. v. MatalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Personalized Media v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.