Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Master v. Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1996No. 1995-1108PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 340.] THE STATE EX REL. MASTER ET AL. v. CITY OF CLEVELAND ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Master v. Cleveland,

1996-Ohio-300.] Mandamus to compel release of investigatory records pertaining to alleged illegal wiretapping by police officers or other individuals—Writ denied, when. (No. 95-1108—Submitted May 21, 1996—Decided August 14, 1996.) IN MANDAMUS. __________________ {¶ 1} In June 1995, relators, John R. Master, John H. Nix, Rebekah Deamon, Richard C. Klein, and William Weinkamer, filed this action seeking writs of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. SoloveOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Multimedia Inc. v. SnowdenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Zuern v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Nix v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. v. MentorOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State ex rel. Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc. v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Narciso v. Powell Police Dept.Ohio Court of Claims · 2018
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. PollockOhio Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API