Legal Opinion
Narciso v. Powell Police Dept.
Ohio Court of Claims
Decided October 22, 2018No. 2018-01195PQPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Narciso v. Powell Police Dept.,
2018-Ohio-4590.] {¶1} Ohio’s Public Records Act, R.C. 149.43, provides a remedy for production DEAN NARCISO Case No. 2018-01195PQ Requester Special Master Jeffery W. Clark v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION POWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT Respondent of records under R.C. 2743.75 if the court of claims determines that a public office has denied access to public records in violation of R.C. 149.43(B). The policy underlying the Act is that “open government serves the public interest and our democratic system.” State ex rel. Dann v. Taft, 109 Ohio St.3d 364,
2006-Ohio-182…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Cynthia Bloch and Thomas Bloch v. Sheriff L. John RibarCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Lambert v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Officer Melissa Kallstrom v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Claims · 2020
- Sutelan v. Ohio State Univ.Ohio Court of Claims · 2019
- Eye on Ohio v. Ohio Dept. of HealthOhio Court of Claims · 2020
- Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosec. Atty.Ohio Court of Claims · 2019
- Brandt v. Solon Police Dept.Ohio Court of Claims · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.