Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Master v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1996No. 95-1108PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Per curiam

As a preliminary matter, respondents have moved to strike relators’ lengthy complaint on the basis that the complaint does not contain a short and plain statement of relators’ claims as required by Civ.R. 8(A). Respondents contend that relators’ complaint is replete with “redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.” Civ.R. 12(F). Respondent Allen has also moved to dismiss relators’ claim against her to investigate various matters, pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6), failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

While Civ.R. 8(A) generally requires only notice pleading,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. James v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. State v. McKnightOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Mootispaw v. EcksteinOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer, Div. of Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc. v. DupuisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Askew v. GoldhartOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Besser v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 2000

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API