State ex rel. Zuern v. Leis
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We find that the court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in finding that the sheriff’s department’s homicide investigative file did not qualify as an exempt “trial preparation record” under R.C. 149.43(A)(4). Further, we find that respondents waived any possible exemption to public release of the records by voluntarily disclosing them in the Pence case. Hence, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
In their two propositions of law, respondents argue for a broad interpretation of the “trial preparation *21record” exemption to R.C. 149.43, which mandates release of public records.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Robert S. Cooper, Jr. v. The Department of the Navy of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. University of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Clark v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer, Div. of Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc. v. DupuisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Franklin County Sheriff's Department v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Dawson v. Bloom-Carroll Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State ex rel. Dillery v. IcsmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.