Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Nix v. Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1998No. 1998-0068PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 379.] THE STATE EX REL. NIX ET AL. v. CITY OF CLEVELAND ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Nix v. Cleveland,

1998-Ohio-290.] Public records—Mandamus to compel release of investigatory and other records pertaining to alleged illegal wiretapping by Cleveland police officers or other individuals—Writ denied, when—Attorney fees denied, when. (No. 98-68—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 14, 1998.) IN MANDAMUS. __________________ {¶ 1} This is one of several acrimonious cases arising from the following pertinent facts. In…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. United States v. Donald E. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. United States v. William H. White, Sr., United States of America v. Lester H. Finotti, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  5. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Leslie v. Ohio Housing Finance AgencyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P. v. Givaudan Flavors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State Ex Rel. Dawson v. Bloom-Carroll Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State ex rel. Citizens for Open, Responsive & Accountable Government v. RegisterOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. BrunsonOhio Supreme Court · 2022

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API