Legal Opinion

Foote v. Posey

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1958No. Civ. 17896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants Gerald V. Posey and Linda Posey to quiet title to real property hereafter referred to as 2094 Mission Street, San Francisco. Defendants answered, then filed an amendment to their answer and eventually a cross-complaint bringing in as cross-defendants with plaintiff, Emil Fritz and Frank Cotton. By these pleadings said defendants and cross-complainants alleged, in effect, that plaintiff and said Fritz and Cotton were partners or joint adventurers in the purchase of real property at the corner of 17th and Mission Streets, consisting of three pieces, namely, said 2094…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lasry v. LedermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. American Milling & Industrial Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Westcott v. GilmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Beck v. CagleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Fritz v. FooteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smalley v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Bayuk v. EdsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Redman v. WaltersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. KDH Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Cox Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API