Legal Opinion
Bayuk v. Edson
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 3, 1965No. Civ. 10904PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
Plaintiffs, R. W. Bayuk and Cressa Ba-yuk, husband and wife, sued defendants, Jack A. Edson and Robert L. Bosworth, for alleged negligence in the performance of an oral contract for architectural services in connection with the construction of plaintiffs’ home. After a court trial plaintiffs recovered judgment against defendants for $18,500, with interest and eosts.
The complaint pleaded, and the court found, both faulty design and supervision proximately causing damage. Defendants’ arguments on appeal do not challenge the finding of faulty design nor the fact that some damage was sustained by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Eads v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Carruth v. FritchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Shell v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Hayman v. ShoemakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Good v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998
- Fiol v. DoellstedtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Stoiber v. HoneychuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Shafer v. Berger, Kahn, Shafton, Moss, Figler, Simon & GladstoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Peredia v. HR Mobile Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.