Legal Opinion

Cox Construction Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 7, 1990No. 78-89CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FUTEY, Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff is a joint venture which contracted to build a commissary for the United States Air Force at Vandenburg Air Force Base, California. Plaintiff seeks an equitable adjustment of its contract with defendant. Plaintiff also requests remission of the liquidated damages withheld by defendant for delay in completion of the project. In this motion, defendant asserts that the claim certification was defective because only one member of the joint venture signed it and did…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  2. Skelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  3. United States v. General Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc. And Ball & Brosamer (Jv) v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  5. Great Lakes Educational Consultants v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. KDH Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  2. Robin Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Universal Coatings/Won Ill Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  4. Kiewit/Tulsa-Houston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  5. Reliance Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API