Store Properties, Inc. v. Neal
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
From a judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to an order sustaining a demurrer to its second amended complaint plaintiff appeals. The action is one for the specific performance of a contract which plaintiff contends was created by its acceptance of the offer of defendants as follows:
‘ Coldwell, Banker & Company, 523 West Sixth Street, Los Angeles 14, California Gentlemen:
“We, as lessors, propose to lease to Store Properties, Inc., as lessee, the property at the southeasterly corner of Brighton Way and Beverly Drive in Beverly Hills, California, lot size 100' by 15CK, upon the following terms…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mississippi & Dominion Steamship Co. v. SwiftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
- Spinney v. DowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Stanton v. SingletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Levin v. SaroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Fleishman v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Beck v. American Health Group International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- City Stores Company v. AmmermanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
- Apablasa v. Merritt & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- In Re Storage Technology Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.