Legal Opinion
Levin v. Saroff
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 22, 1921No. Civ. No. 3922PublishedCited by 40 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment against them in an action of unlawful detainer.
The plaintiffs’ predecessor in interest made and executed the following contract with the defendant Saroff:
“This agreement made and entered into this 29th day of October, 1919, between M. Saroff, the party of the first part, and M. Levin & Sons, the parties of the second part,
“WITNESSETH: That whereas the parties of the second part are the owners of the certain buildings located on the north side of Folsom Street between Sixth and Seventh Streets, formerly occupied by them as ‘Junk Dealers’ and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Warner Bros. Co. v. FreudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Boston Clothing Co. v. SolbergWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Cochrane v. Justice Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Morgan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
- Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Gavina v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- California Food Service Corp. v. Great American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.