Spinney v. Downing
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. J. R. Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
Action to enforce a materialman’s lien for the value of a quantity of brick furnished and used in the erection of a certain building. By way of cross-complaint and ground for affirmative relief, the defendant. Downing set up that he and the plaintiff entered into a certain contract whereby plaintiff agreed to furnish and deliver to said defendant all the brick required for the construction of the building, the brick to be of a certain quality, and at a specified price per thousand; that plaintiff delivered a portion only of the brick so contracted for, and then neglected and refused to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ambler v. WhippleSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Fuller v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Morrill v. Tehama Consolidated Mill & Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1875
- Johnston & Lyon v. FesslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
- Northam v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by65 opinions
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Hawran v. HixsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Long v. RumseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.