Legal Opinion
City Stores Company v. Ammerman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 5, 1967No. Civ. A. 98-66PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GASCH, District Judge.
The plaintiff, City Stores Company, seeks specific performance of a contract wherein defendants allegedly promised to offer plaintiff a lease as a major tenant in defendants’ shopping center in Tyson’s Comer, Fairfax County, Virginia. By the terms of the contract, the defendants were to give plaintiff an opportunity to accept a lease on terms at least equal to those offered to other major department stores in the center. The court granted a preliminary injunction to prevent the defendants from leasing the last available department store site to another department…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Texas Co. v. Central Fuel Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Van Wagner Advertising Corp. v. S & M EnterprisesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,263 Frank S. Yamamoto, Individually And, Derivatively, on Behalf of Investors Finance, Inc. v. Kazuo OmiyaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Mid-Continent Telephone Corp. v. Home Telephone Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1970
- Flack v. LasterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.