Legal Opinion

Apablasa v. Merritt & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1959No. Civ. 24046PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Plaintiff’s action for damages for breach of contract is predicated on a written contract entered into September 20, 1955. Hearing the case without a jury, the trial judge directed that the issue of the existence of the contract first be tried; and at the close of plaintiff’s case entered a judgment of nonsuit decreeing that no written contract was entered into, existing, or was ever executed.

Part of the correspondence signed by defendant M. C. Selleek appears on the letterhead of defendant Merritt and Company, and although the issue concerning who is bound by the letters is still' pending,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Spinney v. DowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Golceff v. SugarmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Union Oil Co. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Vermont Marble Co. v. Declez Granite Co.California Supreme Court · 1902

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Banner Entertainment, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Cedars Sinai Medical Center v. Mid-West National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
  3. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Brokerage Co. v. Hock Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Helm Financial Corp. v. Iowa Northern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002
  5. In Re Storage Technology Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API