Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Magar
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 2003No. OSB 94-178, 94-210; SC S29172PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
This lawyer disciplinary proceeding involves two causes of complaint. In the first, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) alleged that the accused violated Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 7-102(A)(1) (knowingly asserting position to harass or maliciously injure another) and DR 7-102(A)(2) (knowingly advancing claim or defense unwarranted under existing law) while representing his clients, the Korgans, in bankruptcy and related matters. In the second, the Bar alleged that the accused violated DR 6-101(A) (incompetent representation) and DR 6-101(B) (neglect of legal matter)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Matter of Marriage of JenksOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Schewe v. Fairview Estates (In Re Schewe)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
- Riddle v. Aneiro (In Re Aneiro)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In the Matter of Rachel R. AlexanderArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ObertOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ReddenOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SnyderOregon Supreme Court · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.