Vaughn v. Bixby
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. John W. Shenk, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action to recover damages on account of negligence of defendants, resulting in the loss of certain horses placed in defendants’ pasture.
The case was tried before a jury which rendered a verdict for plaintiff. Judgment followed, from which, and an order denying their motion for a new trial, defendants appeal.
It appears that defendants were the owners of some five thousand acres of inclosed, mountainous land, cut by deep cañons and gulches, which they used in the business of receiving stock for pasture thereon for hire; that plaintiff and his assignor, about the first day of May, 1912,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Hoff v. Los Angeles Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Williams v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Howard v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Rey v. ToneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Monroe v. OwensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Gebert v. YankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Dunlavy v. NeadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Cox v. PithoudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963