Legal Opinion

Cox v. Pithoud

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1963No. Civ. 10654PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Plaintiff George Cox commenced an action against defendant James Pithoud to recover the sum of $1,064 for loss of and injury to cattle which had been delivered to defendant for pasturing. The defendant filed an answer and cross-complaint denying any liability or neglect on his part and also praying for $45 balance due on pasturage.

The court found in favor of plaintiff and judgment was entered awarding plaintiff the sum of $375 on his complaint, and awarding defendant judgment in the sum of $30 on his cross-complaint. Defendant’s motion for a new trial was denied, and he has appealed from the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Mitchell v. Excelsior Water & Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Vaughn v. BixbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. Silva v. AngeloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Comerica Bank-Detroit (In Re Zwagerman)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990
  2. Cameron v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API