Legal Opinion

Rey v. Toney

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1857PublishedCited by 5 opinions

•Appeal from, St. Louis Law Commissioner’s Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRyland, Judge

The finding of the facts by the court in this case will not warrant the judgment rendered thereon. The following is the finding : “ The court finds from the evidence that in the spring of the year 1855, the defendant was an agister of cattle near the city of St. Louis; that the plaintiff by his agent delivered the horse mentioned and described in his petition to the defendant, to be by the defendant pastured and cared for, at the rate of two dollars per month during the time the defendant should pasture said horse ; that the plaintiff paid to the defendant two dollars at the time he delivered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Foote v. StorrsNew York Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KrewsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Wilensky v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Crawford v. Cashman & SonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Vaughn v. BixbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Cummings v. MastinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API