Legal Opinion
Monroe v. Owens
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 6, 1946No. Civ. 7253PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
On March 31, 1944, appellants N. H. Monroe and Frank McArthur, doing business in the name of Corporation Ranch, owned or controlled, under government permits, extensive grazing lands in Lassen and Modoc Counties, and on that day entered into a written contract of agistment with respondents Roy and Elwood Owens, father and son, to pasture certain cattle belonging to the latter, including yearlings and cows, at a specified monthly rental. Among the provisions of the contract were the following:
“The parties of the first part agree to pasture all yearling steers and heifers in fenced fields on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Storrs v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Calkins v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Nutt v. DavisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
- Pye v. Eagle Lake Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- De Arman v. ConnellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tri-Tron International, a Montana Corporation v. A. A. Velto and William Wurz, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Noble v. TweedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Allen v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Schulze v. SchulzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Dunseath v. HallauerWashington Supreme Court · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.