Legal Opinion
Gebert v. Yank
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 25, 1985No. B008031PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON (Thaxton), J.
By amended complaint, plaintiffs Rosemary Gebert and Florence M. Thuillier sought damages from defendant Albert Yank, Worldwide Bloodstock Agency, a California corporation; and Does I through X. Five causes of action were stated concerning two thoroughbred horses the plaintiff-owners had entrusted to defendant Yank: (1) negligence; (2) breach of a bailment contract; (3) breach of an oral contract; (4) negligent misrepresentation; and (5) negligence.
During pretrial discovery, defendant admitted certain facts which established that a bailment had been agreed upon by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Esgro Central, Inc. v. General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- H.S. Crocker Co., Inc. v. McFaddinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McKell v. Washington Mutual, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- McKell v. Washington Mut., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Aboulhosn v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Dzharadzhyan v. Exclusive Motorcars CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Lotte Global Logistics Co., Ltd. v. One Way Only Trans Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.