Legal Opinion

Plummer v. Agoure

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1912No. Civ. No. 1223PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment by default. Frank R. Willis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action forunlawful detainer. Defendant failed to plead to the complaint, whereupon judgment by default was rendered in favor of plaintiffs for the recovery of possession of the real estate involved and damages in the sum of six hundred and fifty dollars for the detention of the same.

Defendant appeals from the judgment, as well as from an order denying his motion made after judgment to set aside the default.

The appeal from the judgment is based upon the claim that the complaint fails to state a cause of action. The complaint shows that on August 31, 1907, plaintiffs and several other persons…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reay v. CotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Bateman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Cluness v. BowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Martel v. MeehanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Gross v. KelleherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Nineteenth Realty Co. v. DiggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Mehr v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Wayland v. LathamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Kaiser v. HancockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API