Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. Justice's Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1933No. Docket No. 8881PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J., pro tem.

This is a proceeding by way of prohibition to test the jurisdiction of a justice’s court to try an action for the possession of real property under section 1161a of the Code of Civil Procedure. This section was added to the code in 1929 and, so far as material here, provides :

“In either of the following cases, a person who holds over and continues in possession of real property, after a three day written notice to quit the same, shall have been served upon him, or if there is a subtenant in actual occupation of the premises, also upon such subtenant, as prescribed in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gage v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Peters v. BalkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Reay v. CotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Plummer v. AgoureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Wayland v. LathamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cheney v. TrauzettelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Bliss v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Altman v. McCollumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Evans v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Nineteenth Realty Co. v. DiggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API