Legal Opinion
Mehr v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1983No. AO18602PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROUSE, Acting P. J.
In this application for writ of mandate, we consider whether respondent court abused its discretion in denying a stay of execution pending an appeal from a judgment which was rendered in favor of Peter Finnegan, real party in interest, and against the Mehrs, who are petitioners in this proceeding.
The matter began when Finnegan instituted an unlawful detainer action against the Mehrs, seeking to remove them from possession of their home located at 537 Liberty Street, San Francisco. The action was initiated pursuant to section 1161a of the Code of Civil Procedure. In…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission v. Town of EmeryvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Brooks v. Small Claims CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Mendoza v. Small Claims Court of Los Angeles Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Goldie's Bookstore, Inc. v. The Superior Court Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- People v. HaynesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Old National Financial Services, Inc. v. SeibertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Selma Auto Mall II v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- San Diego Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.