Bateman v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for supersedeas to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco pending appeal from an order setting aside a satisfaction of judgment. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an application for a supersedeas, based upon the following facts: The Electric Laundry Company prosecuted its action for unlawful detainer against William Bateman, petitioner herein, which action was founded upon an alleged breach of covenant and upon alleged default in the payment of rent. The cause was tried before a jury. The instructions of the court to the jury were upon the law covering both grounds of action. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and judgment followed accordingly, for the sum of $3,360 as treble rents, the sum of $163 as costs of suit, for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Estate of CrozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Cluness v. BowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mendoza v. Small Claims Court of Los Angeles Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re BurkeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
- Mehr v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Plummer v. AgoureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Skaggs v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.