Reay v. Cotter
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the County Court, City and County of San Francisco. The action was brought for holding over after the expiration of the lease. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sanderson, C. J.
This is an action to recover possession of certain premises under the provisions of the Act concerning forcible entries and unlawful detainers.
It appears upon the face of the complaint that the premises in question were leased to James Irwin, one of the defendants, by one Richard M. Treadway, who subsequently sold and conveyed the premises by deed to the plaintiff, and also assigned and transferred to him the lease in question, which was in writing; but it does not appear, and it is not alleged, that Irwin subsequently attorned to the plaintiff or in any manner…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Picot v. MastersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tewksbury v. MagraffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Felton v. MillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Hewitt v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Winterfield v. StaussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- Coyne v. De Leo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.