Legal Opinion

Kaiser v. Hancock

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1914No. Civ. No. 1288PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate to be directed against the Judge of the Superior Court of Calaveras County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Petitioner seeks the writ of mandate directing respondent to make an order staying execution on a judgment against petitioner in a certain action wherein petitioner is defendant and Henry T. Higginbotham, as administrator of the estate of Mary G-. Davis, deceased, is plaintiff.

It appears from the petition that the property involved is known as the Valley Springs Hotel and its equipment, situated in the town of Valley Springs, Calaveras County, belonging to the estate of said Mary G-. Davis, deceased; that, in the said action of said administrator against said Kaiser, it was alleged that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bateman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Cluness v. BowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Plummer v. AgoureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. Gross v. KelleherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. McDonald v. HanlonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Wilder v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. De La Luz Tovar Cozzi v. CozziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Sweet v. HamilothorisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Mehr v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API