Legal Opinion

Little v. Penn Ventilator Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1985No. 8410IC982PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

The Commission held that plaintiffs injury was compensable under G.S. 97-31(24). Defendants contend that this was error. G.S. 97-31(24) provides as follows:

In case of the loss or for permanent injury to any important external or internal organ or part of the body for which no compensation is payable under any other subdivision of this section, the Industrial Commission may award proper and equitable compensation not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000).

Defendant argues that plaintiff s injury, if it is compensable at all, is compensable under G.S. 97-31(16), which authorizes…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Barham v. Food World, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Perry v. Hibriten Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Porterfield v. RPC CORP.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gupton v. Builders TransportCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Stanley v. Gore Bros.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Gupton v. Builders TransportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Gupton v. Builders TransportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Harmon v. Ball-Incon Glass Pkg.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API