Legal Opinion

Perry v. Hibriten Furniture Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 28, 1978No. 27PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Plaintiff contends the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the Industrial Commission’s finding that he has sustained only a 50 percent permanent partial disability of the back with compensation after the healing period limited to 150 weeks under the provisions of G.S. 97-31(23). He argues that he is totally disabled and therefore entitled to compensation for permanent total disability under G.S. 97-29. Resolution of this question is determinative of this appeal. We first examine the evidence.

Dr. McBryde, a medical expert specializing in orthopedic surgery, testified:

“I have…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Hall v. Thomason Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Little v. Anson County Schools Food ServiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Thomason v. Red Bird Cab Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Stanley v. . Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Schofield v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Whitley v. Columbia Lumber Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Moretz v. Richards & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Roper v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Heatherly v. Montgomery Components, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API