Legal Opinion

Gupton v. Builders Transport

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1986No. 8610IC243PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

Under G.S. 97-31(16), an employee is compensated for the loss of an eye in an amount equal to sixty-six and two-thirds of his average weekly wages for 120 weeks. As in the case of other scheduled injuries listed in G.S. 97-31, this has the practical effect of placing a specific dollar value on the injury based on the plaintiffs past wages. Similarly, when the employee suffers a partial “loss of vision,” G.S. 97-31(19) provides that the employee is to be compensated for the loss in the proportion to the 120 week period stated in G.S. 97-31(16) as the partial loss bears to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barham v. Food World, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Little v. Penn Ventilator Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Thompson v. SolesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Godley v. County of PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Loflin v. LoflinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gupton v. Builders TransportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Gupton v. Builders TransportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Haire v. Norwest CorporationNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1998
  4. McGuire v. Mid-Atlantic Marketing IncorporatedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1996
  5. Wise v. Freightliner CorporationNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API