Barham v. Food World, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Chief Justice.
The sole question presented for review is whether plaintiff sustained an injury arising out of and in the course of her employment with defendant Food World. Defendants maintain that the evidence does not support a finding or conclusion that plaintiff’s injury occurred on the premises of the employer and that therefore plaintiff’s injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment. Plaintiff, on the other hand, contends that the evidence supports the conclusion that defendant employer had control of the loading zone; thus, she argues that the area should *331be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gallimore v. Marilyn's ShoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Watkins v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Bass v. Mecklenburg CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- De Hoyos v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- Byers v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Richards v. Town of ValdeseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Godley v. County of PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Livingstone v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Roberts v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Shah v. Howard JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.