Legal Opinion

Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. North Carolina State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1968No. 605PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

Under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, the North Carolina Industrial Commission is constituted the agency to hear evidence, resolve conflicts therein, make findings of fact, and state its conclusions. If the findings are supported by competent evidence, they are conclusive on the courts. Osborne v. Ice Co., 249 N.C. 387, 106 S.E. 2d 573; Vause v. Equipment Co., 233 N.C. 88, 63 S.E. 2d 173; Riddick v. Cedar Works, 227 N.C. 647, 43 S.E. 2d 850. However, the Commission’s legal conclusions are subject to court review. Ballenger Paving Co. v. Highway Comm., 258 N.C. 691, 129 S.E. 2d 245; Brice v.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Vause v. Vause Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Hensley v. Farmers Federation Co-OperativeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Doggett v. South Atlantic Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Lewter v. Abercrombie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Richards v. Town of ValdeseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Adams v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Pollard v. Krispy Waffle No. 1Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Crawley v. Southern Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API