Legal Opinion
Porterfield v. RPC CORP.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided June 3, 1980No. 7910IC931PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERWIN, Judge.
Plaintiff presents one issue for our determination: “Did the Full Commission of the North Carolina Industrial Commission err in its ruling that, FINDING OF FACT NUMBER 17, in the Opinion and Award filed by Deputy Commissioner William L. Haig [sic], as filed on October 27, 1978, was not supported by evidence?” We find no error and affirm the Commission.
G.S. 97-31(24) provides inter alia:
“§ 97-31. Schedule of injuries; rate and period of compensation. — In cases included by the following schedule the compensation in each case shall be paid for disability during the healing period…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Guest v. Brenner Iron & Metal CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Vause v. Vause Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Brewer v. POWERS TRUCKING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Shah v. Howard JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Pollard v. Krispy Waffle No. 1Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Johnson v. Jones Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Ruiz v. Belk Masonry Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Weston v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.