Masonite Corp. v. County of Mendocino Air Quality Management District
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SWAGER, J.
The trial court granted in part and denied in greater part the
motion for preliminary injunction of appellant Masonite Corporation (hereafter Masonite or appellant) to enjoin respondent County of Mendocino Air Quality Management District (hereafter the District) from disclosing to the real party in interest, Citizens for a Healthy Ukiah (hereafter CHU), information contained in reports filed pursuant to the Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Information and Assessment Act of 1987 (Health & Saf. Code, § 44300 et seq.) 1 claimed by Masonite to be protected “trade secrets” under section…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Ford Dealers Assn. v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Platt Pacific, Inc. v. AndelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Vacco Industries, Inc. v. Van Den BergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Department of Fish & Game v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Laraway v. Pasadena Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Ardon v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Drouet v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Newark Unified School District v. Superior Court of Alameda CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- PaintCare v. MortensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.