Legal Opinion

Ardon v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 2016No. S223876PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

In civil discovery proceedings during the course of litigation between plaintiff Estuardo Ardon and defendant City of Los Angeles (City), the trial court determined that certain documents City possessed were privileged under the attorney-client privilege or the privilege for attorney work product, and City withheld them from plaintiff. Years later, plaintiff filed a request under the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq.; Public Records Act) seeking to obtain documents relating to the subject matter of the litigation. In response, City’s administrative office…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Meehan v. HoppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. L.A. Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors v. Superior Court of L.A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2016
  2. McDermott Will & Emery LLP v. Superior Court of Orange CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Connor v. First Student, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Labor & Workforce Dev. Agency v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API