Legal Opinion
Vacco Industries, Inc. v. Van Den Berg
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 2, 1992No. B046336PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Defendants and appellants Tony Van Den Berg (Van Den Berg), Thomas Eastlack (Eastlack) and Kamer Solenoid, Inc., a California corporation (Kamer; collectively defendants) appeal from a judgment entered against them following a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and respondents Vacco Industries, Inc., a California corporation (Vacco) and Emerson Electric Co., a Missouri corporation (Emerson; collectively, plaintiffs). Plaintiffs were awarded compensatory and punitive damages, as well as injunctive relief, for defendants’ misappropriation of plaintiffs’ trade secrets. In…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Whyte v. Schlage Lock CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.