Legal Opinion
Drouet v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided August 11, 2003No. S096161PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
The Ellis Act (Gov. Code, § 7060 et seq.) provides that no statute, ordinance, regulation, or administrative action “shall . . . compel the owner of any residential real property to offer, or to continue to offer, accommodations in the property for rent or lease.” (Gov. Code, § 7060, subd. (a).) A landlord who complies with the Ellis Act may therefore go out of the residential rental business by withdrawing the rental property from the market. (Los Angeles Lincoln Place Investors, Ltd. v. City of Los Angeles (1997) 54 Cal.App.4th 53, 61 [62 Cal.Rptr.2d 600].) If necessary,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Textile Workers Union v. Darlington Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Daro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Lincoln Place Tenants Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles County, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Merced Irrigation District v. Superior Court of Merced CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Hoitt v. Department of RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.