Legal Opinion
Department of Fish & Game v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 24, 1992No. C012197PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
Plaintiff California Department of Fish and Game (the Department) appeals from the trial court’s denial of a preliminary injunction to prevent defendant Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) from operating a pump diversion facility on the Sacramento River in a manner that results in the killing of an endangered species, the winter-run chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus Tshawytscha). The principal issue on appeal is whether the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) (Fish & G. Code, § 2050 et seq. 1 ), and specifically section 2080, 2 protects endangered species against…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Wildlife Alive v. ChickeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Environmental Protection Information Center v. California Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Goehring v. Chapman UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Daro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society v. City of Moreno ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Miller v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.