Legal Opinion
PaintCare v. Mortensen
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 2015No. B251351PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEUER, J. *
INTRODUCTION
PaintCare and American Coatings Association appeal from a judgment denying their petition for a writ of mandate, entered in favor of California’s Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery and its director, Caroll Mortensen (collectively CalRecycle). By their petition, PaintCare and American Coatings Association sought to invalidate regulations adopted by CalRecycle to implement and enforce the architectural paint recovery program (Program) (Pub. Resources Code, § 48700 et seq.; see Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, §§ 18950 — 18958 * 1 ). They contend that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- California Assn. of Psychology Providers v. RankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Curle v. Superior Court of Shasta CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- California Building Industry Ass'n v. Bay Area Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Alameda County Deputy etc. v. Alameda County Employees' etc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Alameda County Waste Mgmt Authority v. Waste Connections US, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Alameda County Waste Mgmt. Authority v. Waste Connections etc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- CA Building Ind. Assn. v. Bay Area Air Quality Management Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.