Legal Opinion
Alexander v. Smith & Nephew, P.L.C.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 6, 2000No. 96-CV-1004-K (E)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KERN, Chief Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.’s (“Defendant’s”) motions for summary judgment and to exclude or limit the testimony of Michael Farrar, D.O., as to Plaintiff Lois Dentis (“Plaintiff’).
I. History of Case
This is a products liability case concerning the Rogozinski Spinal Rod System manufactured by Defendant, presently on remand from In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation, multidistrict litigation number 1014, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Plaintiff is suing Defendant for…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Darlene Thomas v. International Business MacHines a New York Corporation Doing Business in the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ralston v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- In Re Medtronic, Inc. Sprint Fidelis Leads Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Alfred v. Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Morritt v. Stryker Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Dyer v. Danek Medical, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.