Legal Opinion

Ralston v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 26, 2001No. 00-3395PublishedCited by 292 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARTH, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(f). The case is therefore submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff-appellant Karen Ralston appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Smith & Nephew, Inc. For the reasons discussed below, we will affirm the judgment.

I

Ralston was diagnosed with cancer of her left femur in 1986. That year, she underwent a series of operations and procedures to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. Beaird v. Seagate Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Diana L. Mason, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Otis W. Mason, Deceased v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by292 opinions

  1. United States v. NacchioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. Avila v. Willits Environmental Remediation TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Conroy v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  4. Attorney General of Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2008

287 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API