Legal Opinion
Dyer v. Danek Medical, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided September 26, 2000No. 4:95-cv-00928PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LINDSAY, District Judge.
Before the court are Defendant Danek Medical, Inc.’s (“Danek”) Motion for Summary Judgment, filed May 15, 1998 1 ; Defendant Richardson Hospital Authority d/b/a Baylor/Richardson Medical Center’s (“RHA”) Motion for Summary Judgment, filed May 15, 1998; and Danek’s Motion to Strike or Preclude Testimony of Andrew Kucharchuk and Harold Alexander, filed July 8, 1998. After careful consideration of the motions, briefs, evidence submitted by the parties and applicable law, the court finds that no genuine issue of material fact exists regarding…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ackermann v. Wyeth PharmaceuticalsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Miller v. Pfizer Inc.(Roerig Division)District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Koenig v. Purdue Pharma Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- Vanderwerf Ex Rel. Vanderwerf v. SmithKlineBeecham Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.