Legal Opinion

In Re Medtronic, Inc. Sprint Fidelis Leads Products Liability Litigation

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 5, 2009No. Multidistrict Litigation 08-1905 (RHK/JSM)PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The federal courts are frequently confronted with sympathetic plaintiffs who are, nevertheless, without remedy by operation of law. Doctrines such as qualified immunity often shield defendants from liability even when plaintiffs have been injured by the defendants’ conduct. As one court has stated, “[ljitigants must believe that judges spend an inordinate amount of time wringing their hands while informing persons who have been [injured] that the court will do nothing. This is not because judges like to make litigants…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Bausch v. Stryker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. In Re Medtronic, Inc., Sprint Fidelis LeadsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Alton Bass v. Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. Wolicki-Gables v. Arrow International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Horowitz v. Stryker Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API